Filed under: Google, Browsers

Yesterday might have been a US holiday, but the Twittering and blogging masses were awakened (by quacking claxons, I’m sure) to the inadvertent leak of Google Chrome, the oft-rumored browser from the search giant. Naturally, everyone wants a piece of the action. Here are a few of the stories we’re digesting:

TechCrunch has some juicy first pics of the browser. They snagged a few blurry YouTube screenshots before the demo video was pulled as well. Is “blurry” and YouTube in the same sentence redundant?

Not everyone is enamored with Chrome. Lance Ulanoff at PC Magazine provides tonic to those who think this is a real game-changer. He makes some great points.

At the moment, the Google Chrome comic book page on Blogoscoped is down because the “server is a bit stressed right now.” I need 90cc’s of Google juice, stat!

If you think Quikboy has something to say about Chrome, you haven’t read the thread over on Slashdot. Go ahead, we can wait.

Yes, there’s already a Wikipedia page!

Don’t forget Mashable’s take, our old buddy Marshall Kirkpatrick runs down the top features and Ina Fried (Webware) points out what everyone has been repeating: Redmond, volley off the port bow.

Google News has a little over 1,000 stories on Chrome, all within 24 hours. So who’s not interested in this thing?

The read link on this post takes you to our Google Chrome page, and we’ll be liveblogging around 2pm to cover the press conference via those who are there. Will September 2 be a watershed day online, or is Google’s browser destined to be an also-ran? Leave your thoughts in the comments, as always.

UPDATES:
Chris Messina chimes in, explaining why this is important to Mozilla and the open web at large.
Forgot to include Kara Swisher at AllThingsD, who references her awesome interview with Mozilla CEO John Lilly.
VC extraordinaire Fred Wilson pulls up a three-legged stool to explain what this means.
Switched has a post about Chrome as well.
Matt Cutts has a liveblog going of the announcement (thanks Ryan!)
Jack Flack deciphers the Googlespeak.
Ryan at CybernetNews asks if Chrome will eat all other browsers for lunch.
OStatic’s Mike Gunderloy has a terrific browser scorecard with his predictions on how other browsers will fare after the Chrome hits the fan.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

More: continued here

Popularity: unranked [?]

Filed under: Google, Browsers

We are liveblogging now. Download should be available from Google at 7pm GMT, 3pm Eastern US.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

More: continued here

Popularity: unranked [?]

Filed under: Google, Analysis, Browsers

Like most of the rest of the Internet, I jumped on the Google Chrome download as soon as it went live. So far, I’m not really blown away.

Maybe I need to use it for more than a couple of hours. Maybe the blogosphere hype machine pushed my expectations to the point of being unrealistic. Sure, Chrome looks nice. It does render some pages a hair faster than Firefox - for example, Google Docs, reader, and GMail. I’m sure that’s just a coincidence.

Still, I’ve already got a great web browser (Firefox) with some great addons that I use heavily. Some of the sites I use every day (including Blogsmith, our blogging platform) I’m not about to switch to Chrome just because it’s shiny and new (no pun intended).

Maybe the point to all this is that Chrome isn’t supposed to be for people that like Firefox. I can see average Internet Explorer user liking it just fine: the interface is clean and straightforward, and it’s great at what it does do. Google’s got massive brand power, and that may be enough to finally make some inroads with the people using IE “because it’s there.”

Me, I’m sticking with Firefox for now. We’ll see what the competitors can muster for their final releases.

What do you think of Chrome so far? Is it good enough to make you switch? Let’s see some comments.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

More: continued here

Popularity: unranked [?]

Filed under: Fun, Internet, Web services

If you enjoy the concept of redecorating rather than the actual process of shoving furniture around the room, then you’ll have a ball with MyDeco. Using real furniture in a 3D room, you can rearrange, repaint, and readjust without moving — or spending — a thing.

With this Flash-based tool, you can adjust the size of your room by simply dragging the walls into place, then select from thousands of furniture items neatly categorized by type. If you’re designing a living room, start with the birds-eye view to figure out where to put the couch and coffee table, then switch to the side view to paint the walls and hang some art. It’s unlikely you’ll find an exact match of your sofa in the furniture catalog, but there’s sure to be a reasonable representation.

If you’re not sure just what to put in that goofy little niche in the corner of your bedroom, use the tool’s search feature to find accessories of specific dimension. A secretary’s desk might look silly, but you may find that a quilt rack is just the ticket.

MyDeco keeps a running list of the furniture you’ve tried and discarded, and also sports an adjustable “camera” that you can drag around the room to see it from every conceivable angle. When you’ve got everything the way you want it, save the layout so you can come back later.

MyDeco is a pretty cool way to have fun redecorating your house without emptying your wallet in the process.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

More: continued here

Popularity: unranked [?]

Filed under: Google, Browsers

Here’s a gallery of the highlights: basic pages, Options, menus, and a few Google services all running smoothly. The key: speed. We haven’t seen speeds like these… ever! Be sure to check out Jason’s full review in the post below this one.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

More: continued here

Popularity: unranked [?]

Filed under: Google, Browsers

Don’t have Google Chrome yet? Well, get with the program already! So far, the feature I like the best is the omni bar. In the webcast of the Chrome announcement today, developers called it the “psychic bar.” I don’t know if I’d go quite that far, but it is cool. Basically, the omni bar combines your regular address bar and the search box into one area in your browser. You can type in a web address or something you want to search for. But it’s more than that.

After visiting Download Squad and using the search box just one time, I have the option to search DLS from the omni bar as well. I begin typing in the Download Squad address in the omni bar. Within a few keystrokes, I am told I can press tab to search Download Squad. It can be used on Amazon or any other place you frequently search for things.
Saves time going to the site and then searching. Chrome overall seems to be trying to save you time and put more functions in one place. Instead of going to Google (or Yahoo, or any search engine) and then typing in your search, you can do it all from one place.

Nice, but is it nice enough to make me change browsers entirely? Only time will tell.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

More: continued here

Popularity: unranked [?]

Filed under: Windows, Google, Freeware, Open Source, Beta, Browsers

Google Chrome, the browser from Google that pundits everywhere have been speculating about for years has finally arrived, at least in beta form. So what is it like? Pretty much exactly what you’d expect from Google: it’s a browser, but simplified. Google chose to use the open-source WebKit browseras the basis for Chrome. Strangely, only a Windows version of Chrome is currently available, even though WebKit is the basis for the Safari search engine on the Mac operating system.

During the install process, Google Chrome asks to import your bookmarks, browsing history, and passwords. This allows you to switch to using Chrome almost instantly. Interestingly, Chrome asks whether you would like Google to be your default search engine, or if you would like to specify a different one. Kudos to Google for this; when supplying their own browser, it would be tempting to say “using a Google browser, use Google’s search”.

Here’s a quick walk-through of the Chrome user interface.

Continue reading Google Chrome - Google’s new browser - First Look

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

More: continued here
Powered by SmartRSS

Popularity: unranked [?]

Filed under: Internet, Blogging, Web services, Beta, web 2.0

Brad first reviewed Ping.FM back in march, and the service has come a long way since then. Today, they announced that they’re ready to do away with invites and open up the service to the public.

Before getting my beta code, I really wasn’t all that interested in any of the microblog/status sites that exist. There are just too damn many of them, and I don’t have time to update a dozen sites every time I read or post something interesting. Ping has made that chore so unbelievably easy that I’m now getting some use out of my Twitter, Pownce, Plurk, Friendfeed, Rejaw, Facebook, and myriad other accounts.

Apart from using the dashboard on the Ping.FM website, you can also update via email or IM. All you have to do is add Ping as a buddy in your favorite app, enter a verification code, and any messages you send will be sent to your default list. If you’re an iGoogle user, Ping’s got a gadget for that, too. I’ve talked about their mobile version as well, which I love since it’ll run on any old handheld with wifi access.

Ping is a great service, and I can’t imagine trying to do manually what their service does for me. It’s a winner.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

More: continued here

Popularity: unranked [?]

Filed under: Internet, News, Blogging, Productivity, Google, Mozilla, Social Software, web 2.0

Used to be desktop applications were essential to getting the job done, whatever the job may have been, large or small. Now, with all the nimble web apps to choose from, the idea of firing up a huge application for a small task seems almost, well, unproductive and wasteful.

Yeah, sure, no one is suggesting you do away with Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Illustrator, Photoshop, Quickbooks and other heavy hitters. However, there are excellent tools on the web where less, in many ways, is actually more. Here are 10 of my favorites.

1. ScribeFire - essential Firefox add-on for bloggers. Allows you to to easily drag and drop formatted text from the Web into your blog(s), post entries, take notes, and optimize ad inventory, directly through the Firefox browser.

2. Firefox - great web browser whose charm lies in all those irresistible add ons that make the whole interwebs experience that much sweeter. Once you pimp out your Firefox, it seriously is difficult to function on anything else. Yes, there are the crashes and other peccadillos, but they’re easy enough to overlook especially if you are truly in love.

3. Skitch - this is the best, quick image editor and photo sharing web app that is dead simple to use. For quick screenshots and sharing photos, you cannot beat it. For Mac only though. Sorry.

4. Gmail - I’ve done away with Outlook and Mail and rely on Gmail for several reasons: free, 7090 MB capacity, integration with Google calendar, Gtalk, great search functionality, and the portability is sweet.

5. Google Reader - free, powerful feed reader which allows you to share items with your friends and slog through all your news feeds as fast as your bleary eyes will let you. Bonus - I’m playing with Feedly (Firefox extension) which provides a magazine like start page of your feeds with complete Google Reader integration and Twitter and FriendFeed and more. So far I like, but Google Reader is still number one for now.

Continue reading 10 essential web apps for bloggers

Permalink | Email this | Comments

More: continued here

Popularity: unranked [?]

Filed under: Google

On Sunday we watched a short segment on CBS Sunday Morning about Google. The company, 10 years old this month, represents the best of what came out of the dot-com bubble in the 90’s. Today they are madly profitable, focused on their core services and yet, still crazy after all these years. Massages, naps and gourmet food? Why, that’s the kind of hubris that brought down dozens of companies in the first boom, so what’s Google’s secret sauce?

The fact is, Google is known to the mass market as “how to find stuff on the internet.” Their success, like most success stories, is wedded to a fortuitous series of events: the price of computers and internet access dropping like a stone and the democratization of page creation and monetization. That’s a mouthful, for sure. Cheaper computers and easier, faster access made computing and creating pages within the grasp of more people. As more people came online, they saw ways to make money by generating content and running the drop-dead simple AdSense on their pages. From memes to spy shots, Google helped the new wave make their wee blogsfiscally sensible.

What all this brought was brand recognition. The average person uses Google as a verb now, and that really means something. Another happy coincidence was the emergence of mobile and mobile browsing. Now you’ve got a vector of adoption that can reach even more folks who merely see the home computer as a porn/game machine but use their mobile devices every day. So the brand is unquestionably huge, which brings us to Chrome…

Continue reading Why Google Chrome Really Matters

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

More: continued here

Popularity: unranked [?]

Filed under: Utilities, web 2.0

Google, Zoho, 37signals and other companies have done an excellent job of demonstrating that some applications don’t need to be desktop based. In fact, web-based calendars, office applications, and chat services offer many advantages over desktop versions like easy collaboration without the need for an Exchange server. But some applications really make a lot more sense on the desktop. Case in point: ShrinkFile.

ShrinkFile is an online file compression and hosting service. Have a large file you want to share with a friend or colleague and want to save them a bit of downloading time? Upload it to ShrinkFile, and ShrinkFile will zip it and host it for free for up to a week.

Sure, ShrinkFile could come in handy if you’re on a computer that doesn’t have WinZip, 7-zip, or another archiving application. But you know what? Practically every major operating system available today ships with the ability to zip files. What’s more, you could save time both downloading and uploading your large file if you just zip it before sharing it using another service like FileDropper or YouSendit.

What do you think? Am I missing something, or is ShrinkFile basically useless?

[via MakeUseOf]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

More: continued here

Popularity: unranked [?]

Filed under: Internet, Analysis

The age-old battle of copyright and artist freedom keeps clanging away in the distance, and are we any better off than we were when DAT machines were castrated in the 80’s? I read a report this morning about a UK band called “Show of Hands” who claims they are dependent upon so-called pirates who download their music and share it with friends. This isn’t much different than Trent Reznor making his music freely available online (and my wife reports the show here in town didn’t look any smaller than the ones in the 90’s — possibly even bigger since Reznor has a new legion of fans younger than us). But the music industry sticks by the mantra “a download is a lost sale, and that is theft.” Or, as TorrentFreak puts it, “there is no such animal as ‘piracy as promotion.’”

Oh really? This sad, antiquated logic continues to do one thing and one thing only: bolster sales of the top-paid performers while creating a chilling effect on artists who would love innovative promotion but fear free samples will incur the wrath of the mighty RIAA, or worse. It’s one thing to send the FBI after some poor schlub who leaks some Guns N’ Roses tracks, or sue the bejeebes out of hundreds of college kids, but it’s quite another to threaten fair trade when artists (who own their own content, thank you) decide to market in ways they see fit.

The only ray of sunshine could be recent rulings regarding Creative Commons which might allow savvy artists to provide music in the manner they see fit, without the RIAA calling fans of the artists a bunch of pirates. Arrr, matey. At the end of the day there has to be some middle ground, but it’s a pity the RIAA and other enforcement agencies see the world in black and white and tend to pull their concepts of ownership from the days when TV’s were also monochromatic.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

More: continued here

Popularity: unranked [?]

Filed under: Design, Utilities, Windows, Freeware

Sometimes you want your mouse to be zippy as possible, allowing you to scroll back and forth across a screen for a quick game of Pong or Arkanoid. But when you’re trying to make precise movements in an image editing application, precision might be more important than speed. If your mouse is too fast, you might have a hard time drawing straight lines, for example.

That’s where SlowMousion comes in. This free Windows utility allows you to select a hotkey on your keyboard or your mouse to hit when you want your mouse cursor to move very slowly. When you try dragging your mouse with the hotkey depressed, no matter how quickly you drag, the cursor will move veeerrrry slooowwwly.

There does not appear to be a way to make the slow movement the default and hti a hotkey for faster motion, so it doesn’t look like SlowMousion will do you much goo in the practical jokes department. But if you need all the help you can get trying to draw straight lines, this little app could come in handy.

[via Lifehacker and Freeware Genius]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

More: continued here

Popularity: unranked [?]

Filed under: Business, Internet, Web services, web 2.0

New web apps often make a lot of claims that just don’t hold up under testing. When I decided to put Quarkbase.com through the paces, I fully expected to be underwhelmed. After all, their motto is “Everything About A Website.”

Holy information overload Batman, this one really surprised me.

Pick a domain and hit search, then give Quarkbase a chance to dig up its research. They say to wait about 30 seconds, though my successful searches worked more quickly. I did get a few failure notices because of high traffic, but I understand why. Quarkbase finds so much information about your website that it’s mindblowing.

What does it find? The domain owner, registrar, creation date, primary language, similar sites (*yawn* so far), traffic rank, blog rank, countries in which it’s popular, description and “official” contact info, people involved, incoming links, and more. Unlike the “similar pages” Google search returns, the Quarkbase suggestions were pretty much right on the money.

But wait, there’s more. It’ll track down numbers on Digg, Stumbleupon, Twitter, Technorati, Reddit, Delicious, and Yahoo Answers. Quarkbase even knows how many times the site have made Digg’s front page. It also generates a list of the most popular recent page and five popular pages of all time based on these stats.

Quarkbase is an incredibly informative tool and undeniably useful for anyone working the web.

[ via FeedMyApp ]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

More: continued here

Popularity: unranked [?]

Filed under: Internet, Video, News

There’s good news today for user generated video sites like YouTube, DailyMotion, and MetaCafe. A federal court in California has ruled that Veoh did not violate the copyright of a pornography company by automatically transcoding video uploaded by a user.

Let’s back up a second here. If you upload copyrighted material to an online video site to share with others without the copyright holder’s permission, you may be breaking the law. But the question of whether the video site itself is violating the law is a bit murkier. The IO Group, which owned the video in question filed a suit agains Veoh in 2006 claiming that the video service could not hide behind safe harbor laws by saying that the user, not the video site was responsible because Veoh took the action of transcoding the video into Flash for online viewing.

Of course, the process of transcoding a video is pretty much automatic, and the judge in this case seemed to understand that Veoh’s action in transcoding the video were about as deliberate breathing. The ruling basically states that as long as a video site can demonstrate that it warns users that they should not upload copyrighted video without permission, removes copyrighted videos promptly when faced with a DMCA takedown notice, and at least makes some effort at sniffing out illegally uploaded videos, the company is lawsuit-proof. Or at least lawsuit-resistant up to a few meters.

[via TechCrunch]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

More: continued here
Powered by SmartRSS

Popularity: unranked [?]